1. The Defendant’s reason for termination of the title trust on December 26, 2017, on the motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 22, 2010, motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”) are newly registered in the Plaintiff’s future, and are maintained as is until now.

B. In relation to the instant vehicle, KRW 4,608,830, including administrative fines, automobile taxes, and environmental improvement charges imposed as follows:

The purport of each of the statements in subparagraphs A through 10 (including the branch numbers) and the whole oral pleadings, and the purport of each of the oral proceedings, of an administrative fine on the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act from around December 2, 2011 to around April 2017, 201, to KRW 283,200,000,000 from around June 201, to around June 2017, and traffic offenses, such as violation of speed and signal violations, from around 2012 to around 2017, KRW 164,550,00,000,000 from around 2011 to around 2016, to KRW 1,417,620,00,000 from around 2011 to around 2015.

2. Determination

A. The party’s assertion that the Plaintiff: (a) the Defendant purchased the instant vehicle under the Plaintiff’s name and held title trust; (b) the title trust was terminated through the instant written complaint delivery; and (c) sought the acquisition of the procedure for the registration of the ownership transfer; and (d) at that time, the Defendant lent the Plaintiff’s name to the Defendant on the condition that the Defendant is fully responsible for the automobile-related expenses, such as the purchase cost of the automobile, automobile tax, environmental improvement charges, liability insurance, vehicle inspection expenses, and penalty surcharges; (c) thus, the Defendant sought the payment of KRW 4

In this regard, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff is the actual owner of the automobile, and thus the plaintiff cannot respond to the claim.

B. In full view of the following facts, the evidence as seen earlier and the evidence No. 11-1, No. 11-2, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Defendant borrowed the Plaintiff’s name and purchased the instant automobile, and the process of purchasing the instant automobile between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, etc.