1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiff requested the payment of damages, ② the performance of water leakage prevention works, ③ the payment of enforcement fines, and ② the court of first instance accepted the entire claim, ② the entire claim, ③ the part of the claim, ③ the remainder was dismissed.

In regard to this, the defendant appealed against the part against which the claim was lost in the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the above part.

2. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is that the court’s reasoning for the acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the rejection of the Defendant’s argument as to the grounds for appeal that indirect compulsory performance is not permitted in the judgment of the first instance, the court shall accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, with the exception of the rejection of the Defendant’s argument on the grounds for appeal that indirect compulsory performance is not permitted in the judgment of the first instance.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.