All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court as to the Defendant’s grounds of appeal, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of all of the facts charged in the instant case on April 201, 201, including the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the bribery on March 23, 2012. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors of misapprehending the logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor in light of the records, the lower court is justifiable to reverse the judgment of the first instance that found the Defendant guilty on April 19, 201 of the facts charged in the instant case on the ground that there was no proof of criminal facts regarding the acceptance of bribe on April 19, 2011. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and the principle

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.