beta
Text
Defendant
A and B Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant C for four months, respectively.
provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who operated the “E agency”, Defendant B is the president of the “F”, and Defendant C is a dump truck engineer working in the said “F”.
The Defendants got out of many repair costs, etc. due to the long passenger car owned by Defendant A, the Defendants intentionally shocked the instant dump truck with Defendant B’s H dump truck belonging to the “F,” and dump truck with the intent to pay insurance money by receiving the insurance money from the said dump truck, as if the traffic accident was caused due to negligence.
On September 14, 2012, at around 12:00, the Defendants: (a) parked the said GWz car on the roads above; (b) Defendant B was on the hump truck driver’s seat; and (c) Defendant C was on the dump truck driver’s seat, respectively, on the dump truck, and then Defendant B was on the dump truck and was on the dump driver’s seat; and (d) Defendant B was on the dump truck, while driving the said dump truck, and received the said dump car thereafter.
However, the first impulse alone, when the degree of damage to the said benz car is insignificant, the Defendants were able to re-beed with the second shock, and the Defendants were next to the said I apartment commercial street park around September 14, 2012, Defendant A parked the said benz car in advance on the roads adjacent to the said park, and Defendant C re-sprinked the said ben truck after driving the dump truck in accordance with Defendant B’s receipt.
Defendant
B The purport of B, around 12:00 on September 15, 2012, 2012, the victim Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., a company taking charge of receiving an accident that is a party to an automobile comprehensive insurance for the said dump truck, is that “C, a F driver before I apartment building around September 15, 2012, driven a H dump truck and parked again, did not see A’s dump truck, which was later parked, and therefore, it would hinder the receipt of an accident and demand to pay a substitute compensation for the said dump truck.”