As to the crime No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, a fine of KRW 3 million shall be imposed on the crime No. 2 in the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On April 20, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on April 28, 2018 to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of destroying and damaging special property in the Daegu District Court’s Ansan Branch, which became final and conclusive on April 28, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

"2018 Highest 41"

1. On October 4, 2017, around 01:40 on October 4, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) around the front of the office of the Defendant in the Dong-dong building B and the second floor of the Defendant; (b) around the opening of the office of the Defendant, the former Defendant made several calls to the Victim C (In women, 43 years of age) on several occasions; and (c) on several occasions, the Defendant took part in the head of the victim by hand; and (d) on several occasions, when the victim’s buckbucks part of the victim’s bucks for treatment, the Defendant put the victim on the account of the unclaimed

"2018 Highest 652"

2. On September 22, 2018, the Defendant and the victim D living together for about five years with the Defendant and the victim.

On September 2, 2018, around 04:05, the Defendant sought to locate the house of the above victim B, and the second floor of the above victim, “it is necessary to verify whether they are together with other males”, sound, and open the door. However, as the victim refused to do so, the Defendant boarded the victim’s house behind the house of the victim, and entered the door to the door.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 41]

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Investigation Report (Attachment of Suspect C Photographs) [Attachment of the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion that there was no fact at the time of the victim C by hand or by appearance as shown in the facts charged, but the victim made a specific and natural statement in this court as a substitute for the fact of damage and the circumstances before and after it, and in light of the fact that the victim’s buckbucks photographs taken four days after the instant case supporting the victim’s statement and the victim’s attitude of statement, etc., the credibility of the victim’s statement can be acknowledged, and thus, the Defendant and the defense counsel’s above assertion is not accepted]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A report on internal investigation (Recording and attachment);