Cases
2017Nu61074. Revocation of ex officio rectification of grounds for loss of insured status
Plaintiff-Appellant
A Stock Company
Defendant Appellant
The Head of the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Office Seoul Gangnam District Office
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2016Guhap82911 decided June 23, 2017
Conclusion of Pleadings
November 29, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
January 10, 2018
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Claim: The Defendant’s ex officio rectification of grounds for loss of insured status against employment insurance against B on April 19, 2016 shall be revoked.
2. Purport of appeal: Revocation of the judgment of the first instance. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is that the "witness witness" in the second 17th e.g., the second e., the "witness witness" in the first e.g., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the second e., the plaintiff company is difficult to.g., the second e., the second e.
It is difficult to see that B was retired from office upon the recommendation of the Plaintiff Company (as stated in the evidence Nos. 12, 13, and 15 additionally submitted by the Defendant at the trial and the testimony of witness B at the trial of the first instance, C took part in the personnel employment of the Plaintiff Company, etc. However, such circumstance alone alone seems to have taken part in B’s resignation against the Plaintiff Company’s own will.
It is difficult to see that he has resigned.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges
The presiding judge, the judge and the marine judge
Judges Woo-ok
Judges Song Sung-sung