beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
excessive two rupt (No. 1) seized shall be confiscated.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a victim E (n, 53 years of age) and was a internal relationship.
1. On August 2014, the Defendant damaged the property owned by the victim due to the following: (a) the Defendant ordered coffee from the multilateral side of the victim E (n.e., 53 years old) in the Seocho-si, Seocho-si, 2014, and talked about the male who had previously been talked by the victim; and (b) the Defendant destroyed the victim’s property by cutting off the dys of the market price so that the dys might cause defects in the table.
2. The Defendant, at around 21:30 on September 15, 2014, at the Defendant’s residence located in Seosan-si G Apartment 101 Dong 201 dong 201, the Defendant tried to arrange the relationship between the victim and the male who had come to talk with the victim while talking with the victim, and the Defendant presented a text message received from the male, “If there is a mind to arrange with the male as he was the end of the party, and if there is no difference between them, he will come to go to one time on how the male would come to go to.” The Defendant sent the victim a defect that the victim intends to go to go to the victim after receiving a telephone from the male who was not the victim.
The Defendant continued to capture the victim into the victim by assaulting him/her for about three hours, such as cutting off the shot of the defect that the victim intends to go out of, and scaming him/her once, and preventing him/her from leaving the above place for about three hours.
3. A victim H (the age of 49) who was found to have received text messages to the effect that the Defendant was detained by the above E at the place specified in paragraph (2) around 01:30 on September 16, 2014, and found that the victim H (the age of 49) was a camping net, and took a view that the Defendant’s dwelling corridor had a sound of opening another heading door door from the Defendant’s dwelling corridor, and that he was able to have taken it up against this, and that he was able to take a dangerous object against this.