logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2020.07.23 2020고단321
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On March 18, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a year of imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on March 18, 2020, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 26,

【Criminal Facts】

1. On April 2019, the Defendant called “B” to the effect that “B was in a relationship between C and private relationship and the Defendant’s friendship D with the Defendant, who was fested in the past at a time lower than the end of the Siljin-si (hereinafter referred to as “C”) and called “B was in a relationship with B’s captain C. B went back even after C’s house, and went back to C’s roadway, and went to C’s roadway.”

However, in fact, the victim and C did not have internal relations, and the victim did not enter the house of C, or did not buy the vehicle to C.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On August 28, 2019, at around 12:35, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim by saying, “B intentionally approaching B, and taken off E and G fishing place in the vicinity of the G fishing place operated by the victim B, and 4 persons, such as the victim and his body I, who had worked there at the place.”

3. On January 4, 2020, the Defendant committed an assault, such as, under the influence of alcohol, assaulting the part of the above L’s worship, which solicits the Defendant to return to the house while drinking, while under the influence of alcohol, on the ground that L on the part of the K box, who was on night duty in front of the Haak-si Military Police Station in the JJ, does not enter the Defendant’s horse, on the ground that L’s night duty does not take the Defendant’s horse.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B and L;

1. Application of violence photographs and CD image-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow