logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.08.08 2013고단2201
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged of this case is that "A is the driver of B truck belonging to the defendant company, and around 16:27 March 14, 2006, at the Incheon Highway Branch Office, the height of which is 4.2 meters higher than 0.35 meters, and thus, a road management authority's restriction on vehicle operation was violated, and the defendant, an employee of the defendant, committed such an offense as above," and the prosecutor is amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005, and the defendant is not guilty of the violation of Articles 86, 83 (1) 2, and 54 (1) of the former Road Act (wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008). In the event that the defendant was not prosecuted by the defendant, the part of the charges of this case constitutes an act of violation under Article 280 of the Criminal Procedure Act, which constitutes an act of violation of Article 97 (1) 200 of the same Act, which is retroactively decided by the Constitutional Court.

arrow