beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
The application for compensation order of this case shall be dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendants’ co-principal Defendant A operates “G” in the “F market” located in the Daegu-gu Seo-gu E, and Defendant B operates the “H” in the said “F market.”
Defendant
B: (a) Defendant A conspired to receive money from the victim I and the victim D for a bond play on the part of the market, with the following: (b) there is a difference in lending money to Defendant A, with the intention of lending money more than three years; (c) there is a difference in name; and (d) there is a difference in lending money to B; and (c) the Defendant A consented to the lending of money at 10 macs per day; and (d) the Defendants acquired money from the victim I and the victim D for a bond play.
On October 30, 2009, Defendant A made a false statement with the victim “G” to the effect that Defendant A would lend money to the victim in the manner of the number of days, fraternitys, and calendars, and would give the loan to the party who is aware of a large number of people with the surrounding credit. In addition, Defendant A would lend money to the victim in the manner of the number of days, fraternitys, and calendars, and would give him/her the principal and interest of the principal and interest, and then, Defendant A would lend money to K, “L,” “L,” “N,” “N,” “P, Q,” and “R,” etc., who are merchants working in the K market and the J market.
However, the above "K", "L", and "M" were processed goods, and even if they borrowed money from the victim, the defendant Gap gave it to the defendant Eul, and the defendant Eul, if the defendant Eul takes part of the borrowed money to the defendant Eul, the defendant Eul provided the victim with the money, and therefore, the defendant Eul did not have the intention or ability to lend it to the above merchant even if he received the money from the victim.
Defendant
A is the Daegu Bank Account (T) in the name of Defendant A, under the pretext of lending from the victim to the said K around July 15, 2010.