The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that us (Ga 2m, height 1-2m) made up of 16 months after the “D office” operated by the Defendant in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and us (Ga 2m, height 1-2m) was installed in a simple rackter, thereby raising 16 months a match (25 km, 68cm) and a pet dog.

When any person raises a large scale of a dog, he/she has a duty of care to prevent the dog from being running in Korea and from causing harm to people.

Nevertheless, at around June 3, 2014, the Defendant neglected to do so and caused the victim E who walked from the above place to be in excess of the floor of the game. However, at around June 3, 2014, the Defendant neglected to do so and caused the victim E who walked from the above place.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim E, such as “influenites and tensions,” which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement bound in the trial records, the victim E can recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on November 7, 2014, which is after the institution of the instant prosecution. Thus, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.