Defendant

All appeals filed by E and the prosecutor are dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Defendant

E (Finitely, 400,000 won of fine, confiscation, and collection) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, there is an error of misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of the legal principles as to the credibility of evidence, the judgment of the court below which acquitted Defendant A on the ground of the lack of evidence although Defendant A conspired with Defendant D to recognize the fact that Defendant A operated “T”.

The sentence imposed by the court below (with respect to Defendant A) on the grounds that the sentence of unfair sentencing (six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is too uneasible and unfair.

Judgment

Part 1 of the facts charged by the prosecutor's assertion of mistake and misapprehension of legal principles against Defendant A) Any person who intends to conduct domestic fee-charging job placement services shall register with the Governor of a Special Self-Governing Province or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over the location of the principal place of business. Nevertheless, the Defendant conspired with Co-Defendant D of the lower court in collusion with Co-Defendant D to operate a news report "T" in the name of "T" without registering with the competent authority from September 2, 2012 to January 12, 2013, the Defendant was called as "T" in the facts charged, and the Defendant was called for contact with women in the region of Asan by using the news phone, singing, singing, sing, and singing bars, etc., and offered a female contact loan to entertainment bars, etc. by putting 25,000 won and 200 won after deducting the first time of female contact loan from 10,000 won, 30,000 won and 20,00 won.