2016Na32432 Compensation (as defined)

Appellants

○ ○

Seoul Mapo-ro 83

Seoul Jongno-ro 19

Law Firm Han-chul et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant

Attorney Yoon Sang-won

Appellant Saryary appellant

Park ○

Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yangcheon 140

Service place, Kimpo-si, High Village Eup 67 - 53

Law Firm at present, Counsel for defendant-appellant

Attorney Ba-ho et al.

Seoul Western District Court Decision 2015Da227539 Decided February 16, 2016

June 28, 2016

August 12, 2016

1. Each appeal filed by the plaintiff and the defendant is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s KRW 50,00,000 and its duplicate from May 28, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

5% per annum and 20% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment.

H. D. D.

2. Purport of appeal

A. The plaintiff;

In the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff falling under the order to pay below

C. The Defendant: (a) KRW 4,000,000 for the Plaintiff and its duplicate from May 28, 2015 for the Plaintiff.

5% per annum and 15% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment.

H. D. D.

B. Defendant

In the judgment of the first instance court against the defendant, the part of the judgment against the defendant shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim

The dismissal is dismissed.

1. Basic facts

피고는 2015. 5. 28. 17 : 43경 자신이 운영하는 인터넷 사이트인 " 박○○ 기자의 스포츠 춘추 ( http : / / blog. naver. com / ○○○○○○○ ) " 에 " 그냥 드는 생각 " 이라는 제목으로 아래와 같은 글 ( 이하 ' 이 사건 게시글 ' 이라 한다 ) 1 ) 을 게시하였다 .그냥 드는 생각 하나 .한화 김성근 감독에 대한 많은 이야기가 나온다 .야구계 이너서클과 대중이 아는 사실 혹은 진실 사이에 간극이 있을지도 모른다그리고 세상은 어차피 50대 50이다. 서로의 다름과 차이를 인정하는게 중요하지 않을까 싶다 .하지만, 무언가를 비판하려면, 그리고 비판하는 이가 평범한 야구팬이 아니라면 사적 감정이나 비아냥은 모두에게 별 도움이 되지 않을거 같다 .그 가운데 한분께 꼭 드리고 싶은 말이 있다 .김성근 감독을 팩트나 다른 시각이 아닌 사적 감정으로 똘똘 뭉쳐 비난하실거라면 앞으로 대중 앞에서 ' 정의 ' 니 ' 선진야구는 어떠니 이런 이야기는 하지 않으셨으면 한다 .선진야구계에선 윗사람 로비해서 여기저기 얼굴 내미는 경우는 없을 것 같은데, 그것도 한두 번도 아니고, 요즘도 똑같으시던데. 정말 대단하다는 생각밖엔. 그 시간에 자신의 분야에더 열중하고 연구하면 지금보다 훨씬 좋은 성과를 내지 않을까. 그리고 말의 설득력도 있을테고, 무엇보다 외마디 의성어보다 더 유익하고 풍성한 이야기를 전할 수 있을 것이다 .물론 늘 교훈으로 삼고 있다. ' 지금보다 훨씬 나이가 들어도 내가 만났던 선수들 이름 팔아부당이익을 챙기진 않겠다 ' 는 교훈 말이다 . [ 인정근거 ] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제1호증의 기재, 변론 전체의 취지

2. Determination

A. Whether to specify the object of defamation

1) The parties’ assertion

As to the assertion that the Defendant written the instant notice in mind with a third party, not the Plaintiff, and that the expression of the instant notice alone cannot be seen as being identified as the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff asserts that the instant notice cannot be deemed as being written by the Plaintiff, in light of the content of the Plaintiff’s Mamadd's outer language, “advanced camping district,” “the upper part of the Plaintiff,” “the unjust enrichment by selling the name of the players,” etc.

2) Determination

In order to establish tort due to defamation, the victim must be identified, but it does not necessarily require a person's name to be specified in such specification, and even if a person's name is not indicated, if it is possible to find out whose name is indicated in light of the surrounding circumstances and comprehensiveness of the contents of the expression, it shall be deemed that the victim was specified (see Supreme Court Decision 93Da36622 delivered on May 10, 1994).

In light of the following circumstances, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 4, it appears that the plaintiff frequently mentioned the term "Advance camping district" and "Definition," which is the expression in the notice of this case, in the process of reporting the sports team's work as a special strike in the U.S., for a long period of time, and coverage, and then doing domestic professional camping," and the plaintiff's act as a person in exclusive charge of the gambling that entered the domain in the U.S. at the time of the U.S., it is easy for the plaintiff to easily use the plaintiff's name and "the plaintiff's expression of this case" as well as "the plaintiff's expression of this case," "the plaintiff's expression of this case," which is an expression of "the plaintiff's 3's opinion of this case," which is an expression of "the plaintiff's opinion of this case," and "the plaintiff's expression of this case," which is an expression of "the plaintiff's opinion of this case," which is not an expression of "the plaintiff's opinion of this case's opinion."

B. Whether the act constitutes defamation

In order to establish defamation due to posting on the Internet, specific facts must be publicly known. Whether posting on the Internet constitutes tort by destroying the reputation of another person should be determined on the basis of the overall appearance that the posting on the Internet comprehensively takes into account the objective contents of the posting, the ordinary meaning of the words used, the connection method of the phrases, etc. under the premise of the general method of posting on the basis of the overall purport of the posting on the Internet. Furthermore, the meaning of the posting on the Internet should be considered together with the meaning of the posting on the basis of the overall appearance of the general public (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Da4138, Jun. 12, 2014). In addition, if not only the expressive act expressing facts, but also the expressive act expressing opinions or commentaries, if the posting on the Internet indicates facts that constitute the premise at the same time, such defamation on the civil law can be established (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 9Da31536, Feb. 9, 199).

앞서 본 인정사실에 의하면, 원고가 이 사건 게시글에서 ① 대중 앞에서 정의 또는 선진야구를 언급하지만 이는 사실에 기반하지 않고 사적 감정으로 똘똘 뭉쳐 김성근 감독을 비난하고 있고, ② 윗사람 로비해서 여기저기 얼굴 내미는 일을 여러 차례 하고 있으며, ③ 자신이 만났던 선수들의 이름을 팔아 부당한 이익을 챙기고 있다고라고 표현함으로써 이로 인하여 원고의 사회적 가치 내지 평가를 저해하는 사실을 적시하였다고 할 것이다. 위와 같은 피고의 불법행위로 인하여 원고가 상당한 정신적 고통을 받았을 것임은 경험칙상 명백하므로 피고는 원고에게 이로 인한 손해배상책임이 있다 .

C. Scope of liability for damages

However, it is clear that the Plaintiff suffered mental distress due to the above illegal acts committed by the Defendant against the Plaintiff. As such, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the Plaintiff’s mental distress. Considering the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the amount of compensation to be borne by the Defendant, i.e., health class, the evidence and the purport of the entire arguments, i.e., the amount of compensation for damages to be borne by the Defendant, namely, defamation against others, which took place in highly rapid cyber spaces compared with the real world, is not one-time, unlike defamation in the real world, and the damage is not extensive and rapid, and the damage is not only extensive, but also rapid. In fact, the Defendant’s deletion of this case’s sign on the instant block, as long as it was too long as the Defendant took up the instant sign on it, it was distributed to several open-gu sites during which the instant sign was short of time. Considering the following circumstances, it was reasonable for the Defendant to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Defendant, including the method and extent of posting the instant sign on its own 10 minutes.

D. Sub-committee

Therefore, from May 28, 2015, the date of tort, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated by the rate of 5% per annum under the Civil Act until February 16, 2016, which is the date of the first instance judgment, and 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, from the following day to the date of full payment.

4. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate with this conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the plaintiff and the defendant.

Judgment of the presiding judge

Judges Noh Jeong-Sa

Judges Immination

1) The original text is as shown in the attached Form.

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.