A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 25, 2017, the Defendant injured the victim C (29 years of age) who was on board the bus at around 22:50, with the “stringing the mind,” and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim C (29 years of age), such as cutting off the mouths that require medical treatment of the victim at around three weeks, depending on the victim’s horses, at around 23:10 of the same day, as in Songpa-gu Seoul, as in Seoul, when considering the victim’s face, the Defendant used the victim’s horses to the police station at around 221 days.

2. The defendant who damaged public goods was arrested in flagrant offender C at the time of the above paragraph (1) around 23:15 on the same day, and was transferred to the above office of the police station type and office in the dispatch police station type, and there is a possibility of escape of the defendant.

The judgment below held that police officers such as Song-gu Police Station D et al. were unable to act of the defendant and put him on the hand of the defendant, and put him on the seat of the defendant, and the defendant was able to put him on the bar, and the defendant was able to put him on the bar while he was on the wall.

Francing the fire on the floor, and again, the re-influence of steel fixed on the floor was separated from the support stand and floor of the re-influence, thereby damaging the chair who is a public object used by public offices.

3. Around 23:15 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) citing the person who was separated from the office’s office in the office of the Song-gu Police Station type and the office in the Song-gu Police Station type as described in the foregoing paragraph 2, and was in contact with the circumstances D, etc. belonging to the above police station; and (b) assaulted the Defendant, with the hand saw, such as flabing the back part of the above D’s right back.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. The defendant is deemed to have committed each of the crimes in this case under the influence of alcohol, but the circumstances before and after each of the crimes in this case, and the circumstances leading to the crime.