A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

around 01:00 on December 18, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance for about one hour, including drinking and drinking at D’s “D” restaurant where the victim C works in Silung City B, without any reason, under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs at the scene of occurrence;

1. The grounds for sentencing (the scope of recommendation) under Article 314(1) of the relevant Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts and Article 314(1) of the Selection of Punishment Act [the scope of punishment by imprisonment] (the scope of recommendation] are without any person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence] [the defendant is sentenced to a suspension of execution for six months as a result of obstructing the performance of official duties in the support of Suwon Sugwon, Sugwon, Sugwon, Sugwon, who was sentenced to a suspension of execution for six months on June 22, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive at that time, and committed this case without being aware of the fact that he was punished several times, including the suspension of execution by violence, repeated crimes such as interference with the same kind of duties, damage to property, etc., the place where the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties and the place where the principal crime was committed are identical, and the victim did not agree with the victim.

However, the sentencing conditions as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively considering the facts charged by the defendant, the age, sex, environment, circumstances of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions as shown in the trial process.