Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Criminal facts
On March 20, 2017, the Defendant driven a C Pops on March 20, 2017, while driving a two-lane between 31-lane 22-3 and the two-lanes around a bus terminal located in the urban bus terminal located in the 31-lane 22-3, the Defendant turned into the two-lanes, and the E lap trucks driven by the victim D are turned into the two-lanes on the right side of the proceeding, and turned into the two-lane one lane.
After that, the Defendant driven the said dump truck, driving the said dump truck, driving the two lanes, changing the two lanes into one lane, and then cutting the dump truck in the front of the said dump truck, leaving the victim in the front of the said dump truck, threatening the victim. The victim continued to move the dump truck into one lane prior to the said dump truck in order to proceed with the dump truck as one lane, and the latter part of the said dump truck conflicts with the front part of the said dump truck.
Accordingly, the defendant, carrying dangerous objects, and thereby, damaged the victim's dump truck owned by the victim's new environment by using the dump truck with repair cost of 5,155,370 won.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of the witness D;
1. A traffic accident report;
1. Written estimate for automobile inspection and maintenance (E);
1. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that a traffic accident-related photograph and CCTV video camera (the Defendant and his defense counsel carried a dump truck with two lanes rapidly from one lane to two lanes in the front of the victim D's dump truck, but thereafter, the change was made again into one lane depending on the traffic condition, and the damage was caused by a collision with the wind that the victim enters the same lane as the Defendant followed and drive too closely and excessively close, and that the Defendant was not a dump truck before the victim's dump truck.
However, the victim is consistent from the investigative agency to the court of law, and it is possible to change the defendant's vehicle rapidly in the future, which is one lane for the damage.