logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.02.07 2011나32623
가등기 및 소유권이전등기말소등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3. Article 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the corresponding part as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

2. Parts in height:

(a) in part 7 of the 7th judgment of the first instance court, “In the instant complaint” shall be deleted.

(b) turn on the 7th page 18 from the 7th page to the last eth page;

(c) to 3 pages 8, 1 through 9.

The 12th parallel 14th parallel 16th parallel shall be as follows:

If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

3. As such, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. The defendant stated in the court of first instance that the legal brief (Supplementary document of May 4, 201) was not purporting to assert a fraudulent act. Among the judgment of the court of first instance, it is obvious that the part of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding a lawsuit seeking revocation of a fraudulent act is a clerical error. Thus, the main text of the judgment of the court of first instance is deleted, and the main text of the judgment is to dismiss all the plaintiff's claims as "the plaintiff's claims are dismissed."

arrow