logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.06.13 2014고정233
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On December 4, 2013, at around 01:40, the Defendant, who entered into a contract for the collection of recycled products using a cresh in which there is no person who manages recyclables at the separate collection site of double-presidential apartment in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, B, the Defendant stolen the unclaimed amount of market price, such as scrap metal, stein lease, stein lease, and clothes.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Photographs;

1. A written agreement;

1. Application of statutes on a copy of contract;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the same Act concerning the crime, selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. Defendant of the facts charged

A. At around 02:00 on November 12, 2013, the market value of the victim’s non-owned scrap metal, ice leasing, wave site, clothing, etc. in the same manner is stolen;

(b) steals, at the same place on November 20, 21:00 of the same year, the outstanding amount of the market price, such as scrap metal, stoves, stoves, stoves, and clothing, owned by the victim in the same manner;

C. At around 21:00 on November 26, 26, 21:30 of the same year, the market price was stolen, such as scrap metal, ice lease, wave site, clothes, and home appliances owned by the victim in the same manner.

2. It is not enough to recognize that the Defendant committed each of the larceny crimes at each of the above dates and places (the witness C testified from the court to witness the Defendant at around 01:00 to 02:00 on November 26, 2013), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, each of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of criminal facts.

arrow