All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company that operates the import and sale business of machinery and equipment and parts produced by a company with its head office in Germany.

B. The Plaintiffs entered into a sales agency contract with the Defendant that sells machinery, etc. while acting as the Defendant’s sales agency and received a certain rate of commission fees (hereinafter “instant contract”).

The relevant agreement was concluded around 2000 and the agreement was submitted around 2010. The main contents related to the instant case were attached hereto.

1. The description;

C. The instant contract was designated by each sales agency as follows:

(F) The F is an individual entrepreneur operated by the plaintiff D). The agency's 1 G G Incheon, the Gyeonggi Seo (Seong, Sinsan, Ansan, Sinsan, Sinsan, Sinsan, Sinsan, Gunn, Ansanyang, Mayangyang), 2 plaintiff A, the Gyeonggi District, the Gyeonggi-si Incheon, the Gyeonggi-do Seoul Special Metropolitan City 3H Jeonnam, Gwangju 4 plaintiff C, Gyeongbuk-nam, Gyeongnam, Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, the Busan Special Metropolitan City 5 plaintiff B, and North Korea (Yancheon, Kimpo, Sin, Sincheon, Sincheon, Sincheon, Sincheon, Sincheon, Sincheon, Sincheon, Sincheon, Sincheoncheon, Mayangcheoncheon, Mayangcheoncheon, Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon 6F, Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, 10, 20, 300, 300, 300, 10, 30, 200.

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

A. The Plaintiffs 1) The fees paid by the Plaintiffs under the instant contract are divided into “direct fees” that are received by the formation of a sales contract through business and “regional fees” that are paid by the Defendant’s business employees or other agencies when they conclude a sales contract with the company in charge of the Plaintiffs. 2)