1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the re-written or added part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in

(In accordance with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, the findings of fact and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable). 2. Re-written or added.

A. From 19th 19th 19th 19th 19th 19th 21th 21th 21th 199.

【No evidence exists to acknowledge that the deceased’s identification card, certificate of personal seal impression, etc. submitted by the Defendants to the Defendant C, and the evidence alone is insufficient to deem that the deceased promised to pay off the deceased’s debt amounting to KRW 600 million in lieu of the Defendant B’s debt.”

나. 제1심 판결 10쪽 2행에서 8행 ㉣ 이하 부분을 다음과 같이 다시 쓴다.

『 ㉣ 피고 C는 2010. 7. 23. 망인으로부터 6억 원에 대한 이자 명목으로 1억 5,000만 원을 받았다고 주장하나, 망인으로부터 받았다는 수표(을 3호증의 1에서 5)가 망인이 발행한 수표임을 인정할 증거가 없을 뿐 아니라, 약 8년간 6억 원을 전혀 갚지 않다가 갑자기 1억 5,000만 원이나 되는 거액을 이자 명목으로 일시불로 지급한다는 것은 선뜻 이해하기 어려운 점(피고 C는 빌려준 돈을 받지 못하여 부부싸움을 하다가 남편이 2004. 1. 14. 자살하였고, 망인을 찾아가서 피고 B 때문에 남편이 죽었다고 하소연하자 망인이 매우 미안해하며 수표를 발행하여 주었다고 주장하나, 남편 사망 일자와 수표 발행 일자는 6년 이상 차이가 난다) 등에 비추어 보면, 피고 C의 위 주장을 인정하기 어렵다. 』

(c) 10th 17th 17th 17th 10th 10th 10th 10th 222.

"The account of Defendant D's former bank account (BB No. 6) of Defendant D's former bank account, which is KRW 27 million from March 3, 2014.