logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.05.19 2015고단3242
공문서위조등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Defendant

B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and shall be from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant C was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Gwangju District Court on August 24, 2011, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 26 of that year. On March 28, 2014, the Gwangju District Court sentenced Defendant A, B, or C to one year of imprisonment for a crime of forging official documents, etc.

6.6. The foregoing judgment became final and conclusive Gwangju District Court 2013 High Court 610 (Seoul High Court) and Gwangju District Court 2014No 745 (Appellate Court).

【Defendant A was engaged in a false conduct due to the passing of a city and a city and the performance of the Board of Audit and Inspection’s work. From May 2006 to May 2009, Defendant A worked as a director at the victim I in charge of the settlement of accounts operated by H from May 2006 to the victim I. In addition, Defendant A was in charge of overall affairs, including the sale of apartment units and the receipt of payment in the victim’s mother company, and H was in fact operated from April 2008 to the management of the said three companies, including the plaintiff and the victim, for health reasons.

Defendant

B from July 1996 to May 2009, from around 1996, the victim I had been in charge of managing the apartment construction site and selling the apartment by the victim.

Defendant

C served as the director, representative director, and the representative director of the K K's operating from around April 1989 to April 2009, and managed all the affairs such as the purchase of apartment units and the receipt of the purchase price by the victim as well as the K K in the dispute resolution committee.

1. In fact, Defendant A and Defendant C had no intent or ability to pay street funds to the public official in charge in order to order the relocation project of military units promoted by the Ministry of National Defense, and in fact, Defendant A and Defendant C conspired to receive the funds from the victim I by using them for personal purposes or remitting them to the victim as if Defendant A were to lend money to the victim.

Defendant

A shall be the Nam-gu of Gwangju around May 26, 2008.

arrow