All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A was guilty of the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds that the Defendant did not have any scambling and scambling the victim’s scam belt.

B. Defendant B was guilty of the facts charged in this case on the ground that Defendant B had a victim’s right hand, had a fluored hand and had a fluored hand, and had a fluored hand, and thus, Defendant B did not do so.

Even if the judgment of the court below is unfair, the punishment (the fine of KRW 3,000,000) of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by Defendant A’s argument, the judgment of the court below and the trial court, and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the victim made a statement to the effect that the defendant was deprived of the victim’s f, G, and P’s f, G, and P’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’

3. Judgment on Defendant B’s assertion

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court on the assertion of mistake of facts, the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the lower court on March 23, 2012 to the effect that the Defendant was faced with the suspect by putting the victim’s grandchildren on the 15:00 on March 23, 2012, and that the E’s statement with the victim at the time was consistent with this, and the Defendant’s losses incurred after the instant case.