logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고단3650
특수절도
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the president of the "DPC room" located in the Gwangju mine area C, and the defendant A is the employee of the above PC room.

On July 9, 2017, at around 04:27, the Defendants, after completing the said PC room work, were viewed to have set up a fish-line signboard (hereinafter “one-line signboard”) on the front of the “GPC room” located in the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area F while getting on and off the E rocketing car driven by Defendant B.

Accordingly, in order to install the above set-line signboard at the PC operated by Defendant B, Defendant B set a rocketing car, Defendant A set the electric flag of the set-line signboard, which is linked to the street trees lowered from the car, and Defendant B, Defendant B, along with Defendant A, posted the set-line signboard to Defendant B’s rocketing car.

As a result, the Defendants, together, stolen the Lart signboard at the market price of 250,000 won owned by the victim H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a internal report (related to the closure of CCTV images and the closure of CCTV images) and to photographic images;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (i.e., confessions and reflects, the economic value of the stolen object is not relatively significant, and the compensation for damage is made and agreement is reached with the victim, etc.);

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the above circumstances and the age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument of this case) under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence

arrow