logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.05.14 2015고단1751
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

30,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 16, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (competence) at the Incheon District Court’s Branch Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the official prison on July 7, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On February 2015, the Defendant committed the first police officer on February 2, 2015, 2015, posted approximately 0.03 grams of Metepoptys (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) to E free of charge at the DNA telecom located in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and injected approximately 0.1g of philopon into a single philopon for use, and dives into the Defendant’s arms by dilution.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he provided psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic phone, and administered them.

2. On March 2015, the Defendant committed a crime in the middle of March 2015, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03 gramopon into the Defendant’s arms by inserting approximately 0.03gopon into a single-use injection machine at a public toilet near the new forest bridge located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 23, 2015.

Accordingly, the Defendant administered psychotropic drugs, even though he is not a narcotics handler.

3. On April 2, 2015, the Defendant, at around 23:00 on April 2, 2015, injected approximately 0.03 grams of oponon to E without compensation from the Fmophone located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and injected the Defendant’s arms by inserting about 0.03g of oponon into a single-use injection machine and dilution with oponononon into a single-use injection machine.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he provided psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic phone, and administered them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of the police interrogation protocol concerning E;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Each request for appraisal and a written appraisal;

1. Previous records before ruling: Application of criminal records, etc., personal identification and confinement status, and Acts and subordinate statutes to report criminal investigations (verification of the expiration of the period of punishment of a suspect);

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 (Article 2) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc. for the Prevention of Criminal Facts and the Selection of Punishment therefor (the provision of phiphones and the provision of medication);

arrow