1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 12,00,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its amount from November 5, 2015 to March 25, 2016.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a legal couple who completed the marriage report with C on August 12, 1973.

B. The Defendant, despite being aware of his/her spouse’s existence, was developed into C’s relationship from March 2014 to August 2015, and became infinite relationship, such as sexual intercourse in the telecom, etc. between the Defendant and C.

C. Accordingly, between August 2015 and October 5, 2015, the Plaintiff used a mobile phone from around August 2015 to October 5, 2015, and the Defendant used the mobile phone to find out that “any fule franchis will be subject to opening with a view to one another in the future of the year early early late late late late late late late late late late, and that the Plaintiff has a complete snife snife, a pair of years like snife, a pair of years, and her husband.” The Plaintiff continued to see where the Plaintiff’s body in this new franchis are in theme that arouses fear and apprehension.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Gap evidence 4-1 through 3, Gap evidence 5, 6, Eul evidence 1 through 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts finding as to the claim on the main claim, the defendant continued to establish an inhuman relationship for a considerable period of time with the knowledge that C is a spouse, and the plaintiff's marital relationship has reached the failure due to such acts by the defendant. Since it is obvious in light of the rule of experience that the plaintiff had suffered considerable mental pain, the defendant is obliged to pay a monetary compensation for the mental suffering suffered by the plaintiff.

Furthermore, with respect to the amount of consolation money that the defendant is liable, the defendant shall compensate the plaintiff, taking into account all the circumstances shown in the arguments in this case, such as health class, the content, degree and period of the misconduct committed by the defendant and C, the marriage period and family relationship of the plaintiff and C, the impact of the defendant's improper act on the plaintiff's