The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is bound by the victim C to receive the payment from the victim C.

Around 10:54 on March 16, 2015, the Defendant connected the Internet portal site to the Defendant’s Blogs. “Around 10:54, I would like to enter the Defendant’s Blogs, referring to the Defendant’s Blogs, “I would find the victim who would be in the first place D at once, and would be able to get the victim to do so. I would like to open the Defendant’s Central Blogs, i.e., the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse. I would like to not see the Defendant’s Vice-Chairperson, i.e., the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse. I would like to not see the Defendant’s Central Vice-Chairperson, i.e., the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse, i.e., the Defendant posted the Defendant’s sexual waste to Korea.”

2. The offense of insult as referred to in the crime of insult is not a statement of fact, and even in a case where a certain article contains a judgment or an expression of opinion that contains an insulting expression, which does not contravene social norms in light of the sound social norms of the times, the illegality is exceptionally dismissed in accordance with Article 20 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Do1433, Jul. 10, 2008). According to the foregoing case’s health class and health class, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the fact that the Defendant posted a letter on the Internet portal site as shown in the above facts charged is recognized.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, i.e., the Defendant, in order to receive the right to life in the forest from the victim, around September 19, 2014.