logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.05.29 2015고단1200
특정범죄자에대한보호관찰및전자장치부착등에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On October 16, 1987, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for rape, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court. On February 24, 1994, the Daejeon High Court sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for rape injury, etc.; on December 10, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for quasi-indecent act; on March 9, 2007, the Seoul High Court sentenced eight years of imprisonment with prison labor for violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Rape, etc.) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Ansan Prison on October 2, 2014; on July 23, 2014, the Suwon District Court finished the execution of the electronic tracking device and attached the tracking device at the same time after completing the execution of the electronic tracking device.

【Criminal Facts】

A person with an electronic device installed shall not arbitrarily separate or damage the electronic device from his/her body during the period of attachment of the electronic device, interfere with its propagation, alter data received, or otherwise impair its utility.

Nevertheless, at around April 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:14, at the construction site near the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, damaged the Defendant by putting the portable tracking device and the attachment device attached to the scam, a brick in the middle-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, when they said that the same materials were rapes, so that they do not operate normally.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the portable tracking device and attachment device, which is an electronic device during the period of electronic device attachment, thereby impairing its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: A copy of the 2014 Jeonn second decision, a copy of the investigation report (Attachment of a suspect-related case), a list of related cases, a copy of the summary order 2004 high-level 825 high-level 2004 high-level 7168 high-level 2004 high-level 7168 high-level branch court of the Chuncheon District Court, a copy of the summary order 2004 high-level 1714 high-level 2004 high-level 1714 high-level Cheongju District Court, a copy of the decision 2004 high-level 3

arrow