1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, KRW 442,629 against the Plaintiff and its related amount from April 23, 2014 to July 14, 2016.

In the judgment of the court of first instance, the plaintiff sought the same judgment as the purport of the claim for damages due to the decline in vehicle exchange value, and the claim for rent and medical expenses against the defendant and the joint defendant Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Tsung fire"), and the court of first instance ruled that the claim for damages due to the decline in exchange value against the defendant was dismissed in full, the claim for rent and lease against the defendant was dismissed in full, the claim for rent and lease against the defendant for the joint defendant Samsung Fire, the first instance court's joint defendant Samsung Fire, and the claim for medical expenses against the defendant was partially accepted, and the claim for rent and lease against the defendant was dismissed in full.

Accordingly, the plaintiff filed an appeal regarding the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance, but withdrawn the part of the claim for the lending fee and medical expenses at the date of pleading on June 9, 2016, and the defendant filed an appeal regarding the medical expenses partially quoted.

In the end, only the plaintiff's claim for damages due to a decline in exchange value against the defendant and the medical expenses claim cited in the first instance against the defendant belongs to the scope of the judgment of this court.

Basic Facts

The court's explanation on this part is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The plaintiff's assertion on the plaintiff's claim for damages due to decline in the value of the vehicle due to the accident in this case argues that the defendant, who is the insurer of the vehicle in this year, is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the above damages, because the value of the vehicle in this case decreased to the level of KRW 23,60

Judgment

The court's explanation on this part is "from 6th to 8th 7th 7th son of the court of first instance."

The vehicle's exchange value on the Defendant's Hyundai Sea falls.