The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) is that the Defendant promised to send a set of time to the victim who is a multiple female owner and committed an indecent act against the victim by making it possible for the victim to board a passenger car driven by the victim and driving the car to the extent that the victim was faced with the victim within the vehicle of the victim.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, and the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below is consistent with the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below to the effect that “the victim was unable to consistently make a statement on the cause of the accident (the victim was suckbucks, plucks, and bucks off the vehicle, which goes beyond the second line, and bucks down to the side, while Hand bucks bucks off,” ② On the other hand, the defendant was examined from the police office 4 times from the police office to the point of the accident of this case (the victim was demanded to cut off the double bucket, or the defendant was able to make a statement at the time of the investigation by the police office four times until the time of the investigation), and the reason for the accident (the victim was able to have made a statement that the victim was a defect in the vehicle) and the victim was forced to take off the vehicle to the victim's left.