logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.02 2013가합553847
협약이행보증금 청구
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 26,440,00,000 as well as 6% per annum from August 1, 2013 to June 2, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Relevant status and relationship 1) The Plaintiff was integrated into 10,112 blocks-centered block-based commercial areas in the Eunpyeong New Venture Zone-centered Urban Development Zone-centered, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and 10,11, and 12 in the process of developing the development project. Total land is 50,425,25 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

(2) The project undertaken to build commercial facilities, residential facilities, etc. to build an integrated development project for commercial areas centering on the development zone of Eunpyeong New Town (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”).

The Plaintiff is the operator of a public-private partnership project. After establishing the project company invested by the Plaintiff and the private business entity, the public-private partnership project is a public-private partnership project that implements the development project on a specific site owned by the public sector. The public-private partnership project refers to a public-private partnership project that implements the project after jointly investing in the public sector and the private sector jointly establishing the project company (PFV). The public-private partnership project was planned to implement the project on February 2, 2008. 2) The Defendant, the Defendant Intervenor, the Daegu Bank (hereinafter referred to as the “Tgu Bank”), the Gyeongnam Bank (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul Bank”) constituted a consortium (hereinafter referred to as the “instant consortium”) and participated in the public-private partnership project plan (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project plan”).

B. On June 30, 2008, upon entering into the instant project agreement, the instant consortium was designated as the subject of preferential bargaining in the said public offering procedure. On October 6, 2008, the instant consortium and the Plaintiff entered into a project agreement for the integrated development of the commercial areas centering on the urban development zone of Pyeongtaek New Town (hereinafter “instant project agreement”) with the following contents for the instant project:

Article 3 (Contents of Business) (1) This Business shall be operated.

arrow