1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Facts of recognition

G, Plaintiff, Defendant C, and D have operated gold-type manufacturers with the trade name “I” from July 30, 2007 to “Sposisi H”.

피고 C, D는 다른 금형제조업체에서 근무하다가, G의 금형제조업체로 �겨 근무하기로 하고, 피고 C은 2017. 8.경부터, 피고 D는 2017. 9.경부터 위 ‘I’에서 근무하기 시작하였다.

G On August 30, 2017, the name of the representative was “Plaintiff”, “Sposi H” and “K according to the J Defendants’ explanation” (hereinafter “instant trade name”) and completed the business registration with the name of the representative as “Plaintiff”, “Sposi H” and “Y according to the J Defendants’ explanation.” The name of the representative was borrowed from the Plaintiff.

J The nominal owner of the seal imprint used in the L Bank Business Account is also “G”.

(B) Defendant C did not prepare a separate employment contract with G, and Defendant D entered into an employment contract with G on September 15, 2017 under the employer’s name.

Monthly salary for Defendant C and D was paid from September 2017 to February 2018 from G’s account, from March 2018 to April 2018 to the Plaintiff’s account in the name of the Plaintiff, and from May 2018 to May 2018, it was again paid from G’s account in the name of the Plaintiff.

around March 2018, G of the instant gold-type export contract received orders from “M”, a Japanese company, through Defendant C and D, to manufacture approximately KRW 8.5 million gold-type 2 gold-type 2 gold-type 2 gold-type 2 gold-type 2 gold-type 2 gold-type 2 gold-type 2 gold-type 2 gold-type 2 gold-type 2 gold-type 2 gold-type 2,000,

(hereinafter) The foregoing gold-type 2 sets are “the gold-type”, and the above contract is “the export contract of this case.” Defendant D performed duties, such as exchanging and sending the gold-type drawings through M and e-mail from March 2018 to May 2018, and necessary matters were sent to G by e-mail.

G In order to produce the gold of this case, Defendant B et al.