Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five hundred thousand won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and B are those who work as the F apartment security guard in Kimpo-si.

1. Defendant A, at around 20:00 on August 27, 2013, talked about the fact that the victim D, the president of F apartment, was involved in the issue of dismissal of the principal.

D. In the Republic of Korea, the Korean Supreme Court held that the Korean Supreme Court decided to dismiss the Korean Supreme Court Decision 2011Da115889 decided May 1, 201, and held that the Korean Supreme Court Decision 201Da11449 decided May 2, 201, which held that the Korean Supreme Court Decision 201Da1389 decided May 2, 201, which held that the Korean Supreme Court Decision 201Da11889 decided

2. Defendant B, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), 14 days’ injury was inflicted on the victim E, who was a resident, for a dump to a dump, the head of the Ban, putting the victim’s left shoulder at a hand floor, tightly pushed the victim’s left shoulder at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Each written statement prepared D and E;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter (D, E);

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Article 25 (3) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits, etc. of Application for Compensation Orders (the scope of liability of the accused is not clear);