Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the representative director and the representative director of C, and D are the actual operators of E, which are listed as the representative director, and C and E are corporations established for the purpose of developing robots.
1. A Defendant in violation of the Act on the Occupational Embezzlement and Subsidy Management was registered as a bad credit holder from the time when he was unable to repay the loans of a financial institution due to business failure on or around 2003. From around April 2008, the Defendant established C with investment of KRW 15 million from the land owner to obtain a loan from a financial institution in order to obtain a loan from the financial institution under the name of the Defendant’s name. However, on or around April 2009, the Defendant established C with the name of the representative director of the Defendant, and operated C with the company after borrowing the name of the Defendant’s representative director from the land owner, and continued to use the subsidy that was paid through the robot development project by issuing a false tax invoice between C and E, and a false tax invoice or tax invoice in the name of the subcontractor.
The Defendant related to G task receives the payment of KRW 140 million for the first year project cost ( KRW 9,333,00, KRW 46,67,000 for the State subsidy, KRW 46,000 for Gyeongbuk-do subsidy) from the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology and the Gyeongbuk-do on December 20, 201, to the 'G' task under the supervision of the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology in 201, as a participating agency with H and I, with regard to the "G projects for economic region coordination in 201," implemented by the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology in accordance with the delegation of the Ministry of Knowledge Economy from June 201 to the 'G' task under the supervision of the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology in 201. On October 30, 2012, the Defendant received the payment of KRW 118,696,000 for the project cost in the second year and KRW 75,363.