A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 20:10 on August 6, 2014, the Defendant driven B truck under the influence of alcohol content of 0.124% from the section of approximately 1km to the road located in the same city-ro 15-2, from the front of a restaurant in the vicinity of the original city-free city-based city-based city-based city-based city-based city-based city-based city-based city-based city-based.

2. On August 6, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) (hereinafter “Dangerous Act”), even though it is difficult to drive the said vehicle normally due to the influence of drinking, such as drinking in a drunken state, drinking with snow, and walking without proper walking, on the ground that it is difficult for the Defendant to drive the said vehicle normally, but driving the said vehicle on the three-lane road in front of the Cloul apartment in the Cloullow-ro 15-2 of the original city, along with two-lanes of the site from the original viewing room to the site.

At the time, the driver was at night and a place off, and the driver was stopped by the victim C(39 years old) driver's DK5 car stops in accordance with the suspension signal, so there was a duty of care to look at the front and right side of the driver, to properly operate the operation and steering gear, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving the driver in a safe way.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and stopped in accordance with the stop signal, but removed the launching from the balk, and caused the said balk to proceed in the future, and the part of the back-setting part of the said K5 vehicle which was stopped at the front of the said calk was shocked by the front-hand part of the said calk.

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C and the victim E (the age of 35) who was on board the said K5 car due to the above occupational negligence, by causing about two weeks of unknown treatment, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. The report on the statement of the status of the driver, the report on whether he will drive any danger, and each of them; and