1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 14,056,90 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 5,615,800 to Plaintiff B; and (c) each of them, from November 11, 2015 to December 2, 2016.

1. Details of ruling;

A. Business name: C Expressway construction work (hereinafter “instant project”);

(2) Notice: D3 Implementer announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 31, 2012: Defendant

B. The land subject to expropriation by the Central Land Expropriation Committee, Sept. 17, 2015: The land subject to expropriation by the Central Land Expropriation Committee, Sept. 17, 2015: The remaining land included in the instant project among the land owned by the Plaintiffs and the remaining land owned by the Plaintiffs, as indicated below (hereinafter “the instant land”) and the remaining land included in the instant land among the land owned by the Plaintiffs, which was included in the instant land, after dividing it into the land owned by the Plaintiff, and after dividing it into the location of the owner of H 68m2, which was owned by the Plaintiff, 245m2,05 m2,05 m2,000,000 and 668m2,000 (m2,245 m2,257 m2,257 m2,056, K 201 L 1,634 G 410 m224, B M 1,321H68 M653.

(2) Amount of compensation: 1,054,278,050 won in total of compensation for Plaintiff A; 276,719,000 won in compensation for Plaintiff B (excluding a claim for compensation for losses arising from the decline in the remaining value of the instant land); the starting date of expropriation: October 10, 2015; 3) the starting date of expropriation: (a) the result of entrustment to appraiserN of appraisal by this court (hereinafter “court appraisal”).

(1) 1) The part of the incorporated land in this case: 1,094,034,80 won in total of compensation for the Plaintiff A, and 287,306,80 won in total of compensation for the Plaintiff B) if the remaining part of the instant case is based on the continued use of the previous part of the remaining part of the instant case, the compensation for the Plaintiff B is not paid to the Plaintiff, and the compensation for the Plaintiff B is 5,615,800 won in total, and the compensation for the Plaintiff B is 14,056,90 won in case of calculating the decrease in the price of the remaining part of the land including the unrealized utilization or the restrictions on future feasible use, etc., the compensation for the Plaintiff B is 14,615,800 won in total, and the compensation for the Plaintiff B is 5,615,800 won in total. [No evidence No. 1-3 and No. 1-3 of the evidence No. 1

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The appraisal of the plaintiffs' assertion is unfair to compensate for losses for the incorporated land of this case.