logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고정989
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 3, 2016, at around 18:50, the Defendant collected two booms, which were placed next to the victim E (years 54) and boomer C due to the problems related to the booming construction in the building, and suffered injury, such as internal booms, which require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim when the head part of the victim was one of the dispute.

Summary of Evidence

1. One F statement of the witness E’s legal statement;

1. A medical certificate;

1. On-site video CD reproduction result [the defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence presented in the judgment, namely, the victim consistently stated in the police and this court that the defendant suffered any injury by suffering from the victim's hair due to a brupt, and the F stated in the police that the defendant stated to the same effect at the scene (However, this Court stated that the defendant could not be deemed to have been at this time and that the defendant was brupted by a brush.

) According to the video taken by F, the head of the immediately following Kameras has not been taken by the Defendant, who saw the Victim’s neck to turn on and off by cutting on the Victim’s neck.

) The victim’s statement is credibility in full view of the following facts: (a) the spouse and G at the scene the victim’s scam who read the Defendant; (b) the Defendant was sealed the victim’s scam toward the victim’s side; and (c) the victim was issued a diagnosis by receiving medical treatment at the hospital on the following day; (d) the victim’s scam and degree correspond to the victim’s statement; and (e) G and F (legal statement was at the scene that there was no time when the Defendant was the victim’s scam due to scam. However, the victim’s statement appears to be due to the fact that the instant injury was caused by the Defendant, the victim, the victim, the victim’s spouse, etc. was able to turn back to the victim’s scam and scam.

arrow