beta
Text
Defendant
B shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.
Defendant
B Where the above fine is not paid, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A and Defendant B are those who operate a Cheong water shop in the vicinity of the E market located in Jung-Eup due to the division of husband and wife.
F and F self-victim G also engage in the same type of business in the vicinity of the hearing room operated by the defendants.
The Defendants recently got out of their own locations by F and the victim G, and had been carrying goods in the vehicle and operating the street in front of the Defendants, and they had a strong objection against them.
Defendant
B around 09:40 on June 4, 2012, around 09:0 on the street, the victim G had been carrying a cargo vehicle and sold it to the customers before her shop, and thereby had obstructed the victim's occupation and business by spreading false facts to the customers who want to purchase it on the ground that he interfered with his own business.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant B’s legal statement
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to G of each police statement;
1. Articles 314 (1) and 313 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The part not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A);
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around 09:40 on June 4, 2012, Defendant A reported at the street in front of “H” in the old market located in Jung-gu, Si, Si, Y, that one of his wife B and the victim G (54 years of age) are suffering from a fright dispute with each other in the street occupation; (b) the victim frights with the other hand, and (c) the victim frights to drink with the other hand, and (d) the victim fright to die and throw away with the other hand, and (e) the victim frighted the victim with assaulted the victim for a three- weeks period.
2. The burden of proof of the criminal facts prosecuted in the judgment of the court is the prosecutor, and the conviction is not likely to be a reasonable doubt by the judge.