logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.06 2014가단233310
가옥명도
Text

1. The defendant, among the first floor of the real estate listed in the attached list, shall be based on the indication of the attached drawings, the divers, the diversity, the e-mail, the6,

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 8, 2002, the Plaintiff, among the first floor of the real estate listed in the attached list, leased to the Defendant the portion of 102 square meters on board, which is 5 million won, monthly rent of KRW 600,000,000 and October 8, 2013, connected with each point of the attached drawings (hereinafter “instant real estate”), among the real estate listed in the attached list, by setting the lease term as KRW 5 million, monthly rent of KRW 600,000,000, and the lease term from October 8, 2012 to October 8, 2013. The above lease term was implicitly renewed after the expiration of the above lease term.

B. The Defendant did not pay to the Plaintiff the monthly rent for November, 2013, the monthly rent for December, 2014, and February, 7, 9th, and October, 2014. On November 4, 2014, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant to deliver the instant real estate upon notifying the Defendant of the termination of the said lease agreement on the grounds of two or more months overdue delay.

C. The defendant occupies the real estate of this case until now.

[Grounds for recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, it is reasonable to view that the above lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant was lawfully terminated according to the plaintiff's declaration of termination on the ground of the defendant's failure to pay monthly rent for more than two months, and the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff due to its termination.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted on the ground of the reasons.

arrow