1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the Appointed D are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant (Appointed Party).

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court of first instance uses the 8th to 14th to 19th of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

[Judgment of the court of first instance is just even if the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance presented to this court was delivered to the defendant (appointed party), and there is no error as alleged by the defendant (appointed party) as the grounds for appeal. The defendant (appointed party) asserts that the defendant (appointed party) was assessed against the 1 and 2 real estate.

According to the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 10, 38 through 41, 2, 55-2, 56-2, and 57-2 of the evidence Nos. 1, 10-1, 10, 10-2, 38 through 41, 55-2 of the evidence Nos. 56-2, 2, and 57, the forest land of Gyeonggi-do was entered into during the Japanese occupation period. X, 21 years of age, resided in the Gyeonggi-si Y, Y, and settled in the Gyeonggi-si Y in the 1760s with marriage and 22 years of age A, 23 years of age AB, 24 years of age A, 38 years of age A, 25 years of age A, 38 years of age A, 17 years of age A, 37 years of age A's ownership registration after the division of the land of the above 17-year A, 17 years of the ownership of the land divided.