A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

50,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Punishment of the crime

On May 29, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Chuncheon District Court on May 29, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Busan Correctional Institution on October 16, 2013, and is not a person handling narcotics.

At around 18:00 on June 8, 2014, the Defendant purchased and sold a vinyl paper containing 500,000 won from C and 1g of psychotropic drugs, a psychotropic drug, in the form of a megade, in a park near the transmission details in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Investigation reports (Attachment of Details A in currency withC), internal investigation reports (specific A as a suspect), investigation reports (Attachment of telephone details), investigation reports (Reporting on calculation of additional collection charges), investigation reports (Reporting on filing of copies of letters C); and investigation reports (Reporting on filing of copies of copies of letters C);

1. Before the judgment: Criminal records, investigation report (a copy of the judgment attached and the confirmation report on the date of release) (the defendant asserts that C did not sell phiphones to C, and that C would make a false statement to see his own phiphones. However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence adopted and investigated by the court, namely, C, the police assigned the defendant as phiphones sales on the basis of its own telephone conversationss, and consistently states the time, place, circumstance, method, method, purchase price, etc. of phiphones from the defendant to the prosecution and this court. C voluntarily surrenders to the public prosecutor under prosecution investigation that he purchased phiphones from other persons (D and E) than the defendant, and then inform the public prosecutor who was under prosecution investigation about the purchase of phiphones from other persons (the person who dealt with phiphones in the surrounding area because C would want to get out of narcotics completely at this opportunity, so it would be better that C will make a true statement about phiphones sales on the basis of the following circumstances.