1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

2. Two hundred thousand won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On May 28, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) in the Daejeon District Court's Support on May 28, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 5, 2015, and is not a narcotics handler.

1. At around 14:40 on November 5, 2015, the Defendant received psychotropic drugs camblopon (hereinafter “copon”) by receiving copon by receiving copon from E, free of charge, within a car on the street near D located in Heung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu.

2. On December 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) remitted 200,000 won of philophones to the bank account (Account Number G) in the name of the F used by E; and (b) purchased philophones by finding approximately 0.5g of philophones offered by E at the I convenience store located in H located in a considerable area of Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E in part of the defendant;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Investigation reports (Attachment of details of financial transactions), investigation reports (temporary correction and specific circumstances), investigation reports (Attachment of details of currency), mobile phone calls of Defendant E, investigation reports (verification of results of the trial, etc.), investigation reports (verification of results of the trial), and investigation reports;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal history records, etc., investigation report (the confirmation of the final date of judgment, etc.) and the defendant and defense counsel denied each of the facts charged in this case by asserting that the defendant and defense counsel received scamphones. However, in relation to the receipt of scamphones, the scophophones were placed in a low scopon, but immediately laid off, and that they were wounded in a scopon instead of the scopon, but there was no scopon. However, in light of the fact that E’s statement in this court is specific, objective financial transactions, and consistent with the monetary content, and E was punished for selling scopphones to the defendant.