beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Criminal facts
On May 1, 2009, the Defendant sought the method from the philosolosophical library “E” of the Defendant’s operation philosolosophical center in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do to allow the victim F who was born from around 2007 to be employed as a regular teacher from the fixed-term teacher, and then the victim F, who was a child, was transferred to the Defendant’s account in the name of the Defendant, on June 1, 2009, with the husband He knows the U.S. superintendent of the office of education and well-known and helps the principal of the middle school in the defensive team. On the other hand, the Plaintiff would be the principal of the I High School and connected the I High School. On the other hand, the Plaintiff was transferred to the U.S. under the name of the Defendant’s father on June 1, 2009.
However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to find employment with the victim's children as regular teachers, and became a bad credit holder with approximately KRW 400 million personal debt around 2007, and due to the lack of funds for operating the sugar manufacturing business in the trade name of "L" operated from February 2009, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay it to the person related to the school as agreed by the victim, because he received money from the victim and received money for L operating expenses and living expenses.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received money from the victim and used it as L’s operating funds and living expenses, etc. from around May 15, 2012, from that time, received total of KRW 120 million from the victims for employment on nine occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, from around May 15, 2012.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of each police protocol of statement to F, G, and M;
1. Relevant Articles 347(1) and 347(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act are applicable;