1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant B Council (hereinafter “Defendant Council”) manufactured and sold the Pamplet “D” (hereinafter “instant Pamplet”) around 2018.

The head of the Si/Gun/Gu shall indicate the definition, characteristics, and harmful effects of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu, and explain the E Association in the “information items of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu” as follows:

B. An incorporated association “F” (hereinafter “F”) is an incorporated association formed by the Korean War on December 28, 1989, the remuneration of Korean classical order and the collective order and organization gathered, with the purpose of developing and implementing policies and projects to cope with the mission of each religious order and organization while maintaining its own identity.

The plaintiff is a F religious order.

C. The E Association is a Mesian religious organization established for the purpose of Mesianism and missionary work.

G Wood conducted H, and E Association was an affiliated organization and was its subject.

E Association, H or I is actually used in the same meaning.

E Association(H) is dissolved when it belongs to the J Religious Organizations, and entered the Plaintiff’s religious order on June 21, 201.

E. The Association was admitted to F on December 31, 2015, and withdrawn from January 2017.

On December 28, 2012 and July 9, 2015, F verified the duality of the H, and adopted a report that there is no separation.

F. Many different different religious orders (such as dismissal, dismissal, integration, integration, unity, rheat, rheat, etc.) of Korean churches designate E Association as an E Association.

[Reasons for Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9, Eul evidence Nos. 5 through 9, fact-finding results with respect to F by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant Council stated the Plaintiff in the Pamplet of this case as if it were the same organization or a religious order as the E Association, which sets forth the Plaintiff as an organization or a religious order, thereby impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation. Defendant C is the Defendant.