The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. There is no fact that the Defendant received KRW 290,00 from C and delivered a penphone.

2. The lower court stated to the effect that: (a) various circumstances recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court are as follows: (b) Da has caused a traffic accident causing casualties; (c) phiphones and marijuana have been discovered from personal effects during the police investigation on August 21, 2018; and (d) in relation to questions asked for the developments leading up to the acquisition and possession of the 70th male population, and purchased cash from K with KRW 150,000 in the vicinity of the O,” without specifically stating the personal information, contact details, etc. of the upper line; and (c) in the prosecutor’s investigation on September 18, 2018, the statement that he/she purchased from K was false and actually respected; and (d) Rophonephones were purchased from the Defendant on August 19, 2018; and (e) the statement that he/she purchased from the Defendant on his/her own phone was consistent with the circumstances leading up to the reversal of the Defendant’s statement by the lower court.

On August 19, 2018, in the vicinity of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on August 23:35, 2018, the defendant met the defendant, and the defendant driven his own vehicle to set up money on the road and changed the vehicle to Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, thereby driving approximately 2.90,00 won from the ground to the vehicle back to approximately 5 minutes, and moving the vehicle back to the domicile of the defendant in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, and moving the vehicle back to the domicile of the defendant in Gangdong-gu, Seoul and entering the house.

At the time of receiving a penphone from the defendant in the vehicle.