logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 12. 13. 선고 2018두57896 판결
(심리불속행) 판결 확정 전이라도 특례제척기간 내 판결 취지에 따라 재처분이 이루어진 경우에는 국세부과 제척기간 내에 이루어진 것으로 보아야 함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-8574 ( August 24, 2018)

Title

(Re-disposition in accordance with the purport of the judgment within the special exclusion period even before the judgment becomes final and conclusive, it shall be deemed within the exclusion period of national tax assessment.

Summary

(C) Article 26-2(1) of the former Framework Act on National Taxes does not apply to cases where a taxpayer is dissatisfied with the initial imposition disposition through an appeal procedure, such as an appeal procedure. In such cases, the period of exclusion under Article 26-2(1) of the former Framework Act on National Taxes shall not apply.

Related statutes

Article 26-2 of the former Framework Act on National Taxes (Period for Excluding Imposition of National Taxes)

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow