logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(인천) 2020.12.18 2019나14675
용역비
Text

All appeals filed by both the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it shall be cited including the attached Form pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the judgment of the court of first instance, 5 pages 11 (excluding the marks, hereinafter the same shall apply) through 13 are as follows:

[3] Meanwhile, the Plaintiff issued a tax invoice claiming the payment of service charges to the Defendant on each of the instant contracts as follows.

(1) The defendant is obligated to pay 20.18 to the defendant 20.20.18 to the 10.20.31 to the 20.20.31 (the 4th service price) of the first contract, 2018-09-03, 2018-10-31 to the 20.18.20, 2018-10-31 (the 5th service price) of the first contract, 20.18 to the 20.30.20, 2018-11-010, 320, 200, 2018-11-01 to 2018-12-31 (the 6th service price) of the first contract, 2019-210, 2018-12-210, 308-208-10-31, 2010-6.

In the 8th judgment of the first instance, the phrase “no grounds exist to recognize it as above” in the 7th judgment.

arrow