1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 15, 201, the Plaintiff: (a) suffered from an accident that meets the sniff’s sniff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’ss siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s siff’s

B. On April 25, 2013, the Defendant rendered a judgment on disability with the Plaintiff, and rendered the instant disposition to grade 11 by adjusting the Plaintiff’s disability grade on the following grounds: Class 10 of Grade 12 (a person who remains obstacles to the function of one pipe from among the three sections of one bridge), Class 14 (a person who has become unable to properly dystrophism or any other four strophisms), Class 12: 14 (a person who has been proposed by the Defendant) and Class 14 (a person who remains after gystrophism).

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 3 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The purport of the plaintiff's assertion was that the plaintiff suffered serious injuries, such as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 of the closed-down ground ground cutting and sloping, 4, 5 of the closed-down ground cutting, 4, 5 of the right-side ground cutting, 4, 5 of the closed-down ground cutting, 4, 5 of the right-hand ground cutting, 4, 5 of the right-hand ground cutting, 4, 5 of the right-hand ground cutting, 4, 5 of the right-hand ground cutting, 5 of the right-hand ground cutting, 7 of the opening, and operated and hospitalized at the hospital located in the 7th place without any obstacle to the above listed symptoms, but the defendant did not unfairly restrict the operation and hospitalized treatment as to whether it is fit, and even if the method of measuring the exercise of the middle-sle ground cutting is applied to the physical area of the movement, the disposition of this case is unlawful.

(b) one point of view of medical opinion;