The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (three years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake in depth, and that the Defendant does not seem to have committed the instant crime under a conclusive recognition of the substance and appearance of the Bosing crime, and that the Defendant did not have any record of punishment in Korea.

However, in light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed by the defendant involved in the collection and delivery of the damage amount to the victim's residence by intrusion upon the victim's residence, and that the crime of this case was committed very poor, and the crime was committed in light of the frequency and method of the crime, the amount exceeding KRW 170 million, and the amount of damage amount exceeding KRW 170 million, the liability for the crime of this case is also very serious, and it is difficult to crack down because the crime of Bophish was committed closely and systematically, and it is difficult to control the scope of damage, and it is not easy to recover the damage, and the damage was not recovered, and the defendant did not endeavor to recover the damage, and the defendant did not endeavor to recover the damage amount, taking into account various circumstances in the records and arguments of this case, such as equity in sentencing with the same or similar case, defendant's age, career, character and behavior, environment, motive, circumstance, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the punishment against the defendant is unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.