The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime in the trial and against his mistake, and that the Defendant did not seem to have committed the instant crime under a conclusive recognition of the substance and appearance of the Bosing crime, and that the Defendant did not have much profits acquired by the Defendant compared to the total amount of damage.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant in the name of the Financial Services Commission by participating in the crime of Bophishing in cash collection in the organization of the crime of this case and forging a public document under the name of the Chairperson, and by deceiving the victims a total of KRW 100 million by deceiving them as an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service. The crime of this case is very poor and serious in light of the method and content of the crime, damage amount, etc., and the crime of Bophishing is very poor and highly serious. The crime of Bophishing is difficult to regulate because it is a secret and organized act of crime, and it is not easy to recover damage as well as it is not easy to recover damage, and it seems that the damage was not recovered and the defendant did not endeavor to recover damage; the defendant was not used from the victims; the defendant was a number of criminal records including one fine due to the crime of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act; the defendant was punished in the same or similar case; the defendant's equity in sentencing, career, character, character, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.