logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.03.06 2019고단10
사기방조
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud aiding and abetting at the Seoul Central District Court on January 18, 2019, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 18, 2019.

1. On June 29, 2018, the 200,000 won was transferred from the victim’s account (D) in the name of the Defendant around June 29, 2018, to the effect that the victim B was the victim B’s “year-old lending counseling staff” by phoneing the victim B, and “the low interest rate ordinary people loan,” and the relevant expenses were first remitted.”

On the other hand, on June 28, 2018, the Defendant received a proposal to the effect that he/she would receive a loan of KRW 200,000,000 from an unqualified person in his/her name in the name of the deceased on the morning, and on June 28, 2018, transferred KRW 200,000 to the F Bank account in the name of E on June 28, 2018, and on June 29, 2018, the Defendant demanded to return the above KRW 200,000 from the deceased person on the name of the deceased person after the first instance court on June 29, 2018. The Defendant knew that the Defendant’s account may be used for the crime of Bophishing, known the account number of the above C Bank account in the name of the accused person, and made the person under the name of the deceased person receive KRW 20,000 from the above victim through the said

Accordingly, the defendant, by facilitating the above-mentioned fraud of the above-mentioned person, assisted the above-mentioned fraud.

2. On June 29, 2018, the Defendant was transferred KRW 200,00 from the Defendant’s account at around 13:47, June 29, 2018, to the victim G, to the effect that: (a) the Defendant’s employee was the victim G by calls to the victim G for the “year-end” lending counseling staff; and (b) the Defendant was the victim’s wife H at around 13:47, 2018, by means of the said account in the Defendant’s name.

On the other hand, the Defendant, at the time of the first instance trial on June 29, 2018, is the same as the Defendant’s.

arrow